5 signs your traditional CMS leaves you frustrated⁡𝅶‍‍𝅺⁡‍𝅴⁡𝅴𝅹‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍⁡​⁡‍⁠⁡​⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍‍‍𝅷‍‍𝅳⁡‍⁠‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍𝅳⁡⁣⁡⁣⁡​⁡⁢⁢𝅵‍𝅺‍𝅺𝅸‌⁡‍𝅶⁠⁡⁣𝅴𝅹⁡‍𝅸⁡​⁡‍⁠⁡​⁡‍‍𝅸‍⁡‍𝅹⁡​⁡‍⁠⁡​⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍𝅺⁡​⁡⁠‍𝅷𝅴⁡⁢𝅳‍𝅺⁢𝅺𝅹⁡⁣⁠𝅹⁡⁣‍𝅸𝅴⁡⁣⁠𝅸⁡⁢‍𝅺⁠⁣𝅴⁡⁣‍𝅺⁢‌‌⁢⁢⁠‍⁢𝅴⁢⁡‍𝅸⁢⁣⁢​⁢𝅳‍𝅸⁢⁣⁢​⁢‍⁢⁡‍𝅸‌⁢𝅳⁠⁢𝅴‍𝅸⁢‌⁢‌⁢⁢⁢‍‌⁢⁡⁢⁠⁠⁢⁠⁢𝅺𝅷𝅺⁢‌𝅷⁠⁢𝅸⁠𝅹‍𝅸⁣⁡⁣‍‍‍⁡𝅸

Have you ever calculated how much time you and your team spend on creating content and managing the technology you’re working with? If you have to work with a CMS that requires a lot of alignment with and waiting on development, it can mess up your workflow and progress. A recent study shows that 34% of content teams find it difficult to unify with their development team. When content teams have the possibility to frequently post content independently of development teams, productivity will benefit.

A traditional CMS is developed as a monolithic system. This means it’s a unified unit that’s self-contained and independent from other applications. Adding or removing something from this application can be time-consuming and have severe maintenance consequences. All of this harms the flexibility of your content team and has a negative impact on their productivity.