A MACH architecture creates an open and modular environment that allows businesses to embrace innovation and adapt to change faster with fewer risks. MACH stands for Microservices, API-first, Cloud-native, and Headless.
Myth 1: Implementing a MACH architecture is too complex for my organization
Implementing a MACH architecture sounds complex. Where do you start, which microservices should you implement and what components will be needed? Hand in hand goes the philosophy that when implementing a MACH architecture you’ll need to do a whole redo of your platform, but this can’t be less true. MACH reduces the complexity of software development by making the components modular and reusable. This way, teams can reuse the same technology and can focus on specific aspects of an application. Moreover, using MACH, businesses can create a distributed architecture that allows them to scale better and faster.
Myth 2: MACH/Composable architecture is too complicated
MACH is based on a modular architecture, making it easy to integrate different components and customize them based on the organization’s needs. Additionally, many cloud providers offer services that can help organizations quickly set up and deploy a MACH architecture. Furthermore, many libraries, frameworks, and tools are available to help organizations with their MACH implementations. For example, microservices are designed to perform a single function like checkout or a wishlist. When creating an e-commerce-based MACH architecture the microservices can offer endless possibilities and can be added indefinitely.Needless to say, you do need to be careful not to add too many services to keep track of them.
Myth 3: A MACH architecture is expensive
Contrary to popular belief, MACH is not expensive. In fact, the cost savings can be significant. MACH does not require as much infrastructure as traditional architecture, so the overhead costs are lower. Additionally, with MACH, businesses can use cloud-based services, which offer competitive pricing models and are more cost-effective than on-premises solutions. Yes, it is often the case that the implementation timeline will be longer and the deals can be more expensive. Still, if it is done right the ROI will make it worth it in the long run.