Lead-gen⁡𝅶‍‍𝅺⁡‍𝅴⁡𝅴𝅹‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍‍‍𝅷‍‍𝅳⁡‍⁠‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍𝅳⁡⁣⁡⁣⁡⁡⁢⁢𝅵‍𝅺‍𝅺𝅸‌⁡‍𝅶⁠⁡⁣𝅴𝅹⁡‍𝅸⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅸‍⁡‍𝅹⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍𝅺⁡⁡⁠‍𝅷𝅴⁡⁢𝅳‍𝅺⁢𝅺𝅹⁡⁣⁠𝅹⁡⁣‍𝅸𝅴⁡⁣⁠𝅸⁡⁢‍𝅺⁠⁣𝅴⁡⁣‍𝅺⁢⁢‌⁢⁠‍⁢𝅳⁢𝅳‍𝅸⁢⁢⁢‍‍𝅸⁢⁣⁢𝅴⁢𝅴‍𝅸‍⁢⁠⁢⁡⁢‍𝅸‍⁢‍‌⁢‌⁢⁢⁢‌⁢‍‌⁢⁠⁢𝅺𝅷𝅺⁢‌𝅷⁠⁢𝅸⁠𝅹‍𝅸⁣⁡⁣‍‍‍⁡𝅸

Why the B2B marketing funnel doesn't work anymore⁡𝅶‍‍𝅺⁡‍𝅴⁡𝅴𝅹‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍‍‍𝅷‍‍𝅳⁡‍⁠‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍𝅳⁡⁣⁡⁣⁡⁡⁢⁢𝅵‍𝅺‍𝅺𝅸‌⁡‍𝅶⁠⁡⁣𝅴𝅹⁡‍𝅸⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅸‍⁡‍𝅹⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍𝅺⁡⁡⁠‍𝅷𝅴⁡⁢𝅳‍𝅺⁢𝅺𝅹⁡⁣⁠𝅹⁡⁣‍𝅸𝅴⁡⁣⁠𝅸⁡⁢‍𝅺⁠⁣𝅴⁡⁣‍𝅺‌⁢𝅳⁠⁢⁣⁢⁡⁢⁠⁢⁣‍𝅸‍⁢‍‍⁢⁠‍𝅸⁢⁣⁢⁢⁡⁢𝅳‍𝅸⁢𝅴⁣⁢‌‍𝅸⁢⁣⁣⁢⁣‌⁢⁢‍⁢⁡⁢𝅴⁢⁢⁢𝅺𝅷𝅺⁢‌𝅷⁠⁢𝅸⁠𝅹‍𝅸⁣⁡⁣‍‍‍⁡𝅸

Bernard Jan Boekholt⁡𝅶‍‍𝅺⁡‍𝅴⁡𝅴𝅹‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍‍‍𝅷‍‍𝅳⁡‍⁠‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍𝅳⁡⁣⁡⁣⁡⁡⁢⁢𝅵‍𝅺‍𝅺𝅸‌⁡‍𝅶⁠⁡⁣𝅴𝅹⁡‍𝅸⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅸‍⁡‍𝅹⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍𝅺⁡⁡⁠‍𝅷𝅴⁡⁢𝅳‍𝅺⁢𝅺𝅹⁡⁣⁠𝅹⁡⁣‍𝅸𝅴⁡⁣⁠𝅸⁡⁢‍𝅺⁠⁣𝅴⁡⁣‍𝅺⁢⁢⁢⁣‍⁢⁢‍⁢‌⁢‍𝅸⁢𝅳⁢𝅳⁠⁢‍‍𝅸⁢⁣⁠⁢𝅴‍𝅸‌‌‌⁢𝅴‍𝅸⁢⁢⁢⁡‍⁠⁢‌⁢⁢‍⁢‍⁢⁡⁢‌⁢𝅺𝅷𝅺⁢‌𝅷⁠⁢𝅸⁠𝅹‍𝅸⁣⁡⁣‍‍‍⁡𝅸

CXO⁡𝅶‍‍𝅺⁡‍𝅴⁡𝅴𝅹‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍‍‍𝅷‍‍𝅳⁡‍⁠‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍𝅳⁡⁣⁡⁣⁡⁡⁢⁢𝅵‍𝅺‍𝅺𝅸‌⁡‍𝅶⁠⁡⁣𝅴𝅹⁡‍𝅸⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅸‍⁡‍𝅹⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍𝅺⁡⁡⁠‍𝅷𝅴⁡⁢𝅳‍𝅺⁢𝅺𝅹⁡⁣⁠𝅹⁡⁣‍𝅸𝅴⁡⁣⁠𝅸⁡⁢‍𝅺⁠⁣𝅴⁡⁣‍𝅺⁢⁢⁢⁣‍⁢⁢‍⁢‌⁢‍𝅸⁢𝅳⁢𝅳⁠⁢‍‍𝅸⁢⁣⁠⁢𝅴‍𝅸‌‌‌⁢𝅴‍𝅸⁢⁢⁢⁡‍⁠⁢‌⁢⁢‍⁢‍⁢⁡⁢‌⁢𝅺𝅷𝅺⁢‌𝅷⁠⁢𝅸⁠𝅹‍𝅸⁣⁡⁣‍‍‍⁡𝅸 @ Prepr⁡𝅶‍‍𝅺⁡‍𝅴⁡𝅴𝅹‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍‍‍𝅷‍‍𝅳⁡‍⁠‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍𝅳⁡⁣⁡⁣⁡⁡⁢⁢𝅵‍𝅺‍𝅺𝅸‌⁡‍𝅶⁠⁡⁣𝅴𝅹⁡‍𝅸⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅸‍⁡‍𝅹⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍𝅺⁡⁡⁠‍𝅷𝅴⁡⁢𝅳‍𝅺⁢𝅺𝅹⁡⁣⁠𝅹⁡⁣‍𝅸𝅴⁡⁣⁠𝅸⁡⁢‍𝅺⁠⁣𝅴⁡⁣‍𝅺⁢⁢⁢⁣‍⁢⁢‍⁢‌⁢‍𝅸⁢𝅳⁢𝅳⁠⁢‍‍𝅸⁢⁣⁠⁢𝅴‍𝅸‌‌‌⁢𝅴‍𝅸⁢⁢⁢⁡‍⁠⁢‌⁢⁢‍⁢‍⁢⁡⁢‌⁢𝅺𝅷𝅺⁢‌𝅷⁠⁢𝅸⁠𝅹‍𝅸⁣⁡⁣‍‍‍⁡𝅸

Read time: 10 min

Illustration of a spider web with connected nodes, symbolizing the complex and non-linear modern B2B buyer journey beyond the traditional funnel.

B2B buyers don’t follow a straight path anymore. They research on their own, switch channels, and make decisions before you even know they’re interested. For marketing teams, this shift has redefined what B2B lead generation looks like in practice. This article explains what’s changed and how marketing teams can adapt to stay relevant and earn trust in a buyer-led world.⁡𝅶‍‍𝅺⁡‍𝅴⁡𝅴𝅹‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍‍‍𝅷‍‍𝅳⁡‍⁠‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍𝅳⁡⁣⁡⁣⁡⁡⁢⁢𝅵‍𝅺‍𝅺𝅸‌⁡‍𝅶⁠⁡⁣𝅴𝅹⁡‍𝅸⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅸‍⁡‍𝅹⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍𝅺⁡⁡⁠‍𝅷𝅴⁡⁢𝅳‍𝅺⁢𝅺𝅹⁡⁣⁠𝅹⁡⁣‍𝅸𝅴⁡⁣⁠𝅸⁡⁢‍𝅺⁠⁣𝅴⁡⁣‍𝅺‌⁢𝅳⁠⁢⁣⁢⁡⁢⁠⁢⁣‍𝅸‍⁢‍‍⁢⁠‍𝅸⁢⁣⁢⁢⁡⁢𝅳‍𝅸⁢𝅴⁣⁢‌‍𝅸⁢⁣⁣⁢⁣‌⁢⁢‍⁢⁡⁢𝅴⁢⁢⁢𝅺𝅷𝅺⁢‌𝅷⁠⁢𝅸⁠𝅹‍𝅸⁣⁡⁣‍‍‍⁡𝅸

There was a time when marketing felt like a well-organized process. You built a funnel, and people moved through it. First came awareness, then interest, then a decision. Every stage had its own tactics: ads, webinars, email nurtures. And if you aligned your efforts correctly, buyers followed along.

⁡𝅶‍‍𝅺⁡‍𝅴⁡𝅴𝅹‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍‍‍𝅷‍‍𝅳⁡‍⁠‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍𝅳⁡⁣⁡⁣⁡⁡⁢⁢𝅵‍𝅺‍𝅺𝅸‌⁡‍𝅶⁠⁡⁣𝅴𝅹⁡‍𝅸⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅸‍⁡‍𝅹⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍𝅺⁡⁡⁠‍𝅷𝅴⁡⁢𝅳‍𝅺⁢𝅺𝅹⁡⁣⁠𝅹⁡⁣‍𝅸𝅴⁡⁣⁠𝅸⁡⁢‍𝅺⁠⁣𝅴⁡⁣‍𝅺‌⁢𝅳⁠⁢⁣⁢⁡⁢⁠⁢⁣‍𝅸‍⁢‍‍⁢⁠‍𝅸⁢⁣⁢⁢⁡⁢𝅳‍𝅸⁢𝅴⁣⁢‌‍𝅸⁢⁣⁣⁢⁣‌⁢⁢‍⁢⁡⁢𝅴⁢⁢⁢𝅺𝅷𝅺⁢‌𝅷⁠⁢𝅸⁠𝅹‍𝅸⁣⁡⁣‍‍‍⁡𝅸

At its core, the funnel was just a way to describe how someone goes from “I’ve never heard of you” to “I’m ready to buy.” It was simple, logical, and easy to measure. Each step could be tracked, optimized, and improved.

It gave us a sense of control. The idea was clear: deliver the right message at the right time, and you could move someone forward, one step at a time.

But the truth is that this version of the buyer journey hasn’t existed for a long time.

B2B buying has changed. Have we?

Bernard Jan Boekholt is CXO at Prepr CMS, where he helps digital teams build smarter B2B lead-gen websites. With a background in digital strategy, UX, and product development, he writes about B2B marketing, personalization, and continuous optimization, always focused on driving measurable growth and building stronger customer relationships.⁡𝅶‍‍𝅺⁡‍𝅴⁡𝅴𝅹‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍‍‍𝅷‍‍𝅳⁡‍⁠‍‍⁢𝅵‍‍𝅳⁡⁣⁡⁣⁡⁡⁢⁢𝅵‍𝅺‍𝅺𝅸‌⁡‍𝅶⁠⁡⁣𝅴𝅹⁡‍𝅸⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅸‍⁡‍𝅹⁡⁡‍⁠⁡⁡‍‍𝅹𝅴𝅺‍𝅺⁡⁡⁠‍𝅷𝅴⁡⁢𝅳‍𝅺⁢𝅺𝅹⁡⁣⁠𝅹⁡⁣‍𝅸𝅴⁡⁣⁠𝅸⁡⁢‍𝅺⁠⁣𝅴⁡⁣‍𝅺⁢⁢⁢⁣‍⁢⁢‍⁢‌⁢‍𝅸⁢𝅳⁢𝅳⁠⁢‍‍𝅸⁢⁣⁠⁢𝅴‍𝅸‌‌‌⁢𝅴‍𝅸⁢⁢⁢⁡‍⁠⁢‌⁢⁢‍⁢‍⁢⁡⁢‌⁢𝅺𝅷𝅺⁢‌𝅷⁠⁢𝅸⁠𝅹‍𝅸⁣⁡⁣‍‍‍⁡𝅸

Today, B2B buyers don’t move through clean, linear stages.

They behave more like a network of independent researchers, gathering information from dozens of sources, switching channels, and involving multiple people across their organization. All of this happens well before they ever reach out to your sales team.

They might read a user review on G2, browse a competitor’s blog, jump into a LinkedIn thread, and then disappear for a week. Later, they might return to your site, read a case study, and still not be ready to engage. Meanwhile, someone else on their team starts their own research from a completely different angle.

They circle back. They skip steps. They form opinions long before they land on your radar.

They’re not waiting to be guided by your email sequence; they’re guiding themselves. And while you’re optimizing for funnel stages, they’re making decisions in Slack threads and internal meetings you’ll never see.

The traditional funnel hasn’t failed because it was wrong. It just stopped reflecting reality.

If you want to meet modern buyers where they are, you have to let go of the illusion of a linear journey and start designing for how decisions actually happen.

To keep up with this kind of behaviour, marketing teams are increasingly looking at headless CMS trends and adopting a future-proof CMS that can adapt to this fragmented journey.

The traditional funnel model doesn’t work anymore

For a long time, the funnel was the dominant model in B2B marketing.

It gave structure to how we thought about the buyer’s path, from the first moment of awareness all the way to purchase. Every stage was clearly defined: awareness, consideration, evaluation, and finally, the decision.

It also gave teams a clear sense of ownership. Marketing was responsible for generating awareness and interest at the top. Sales took over as leads moved deeper, guiding them through evaluation and toward purchase.

The funnel shaped how we built teams, mapped content, allocated budgets, and measured success. Metrics like MQLs, SQLs, and conversion rates gave us confidence that the process was working, and a way to track where it wasn’t.

But as the image above shows, the funnel model depends on a single, linear flow. It assumes that prospects engage with us on our timeline, in a controlled sequence, and that sales is only involved at the bottom.

The problem with the funnel is that it assumes we’re in control of the journey.

We're not.

Buyers are in control now. And they’re moving in ways the traditional funnel doesn’t account for.

The need for a new model: The B2B buying radar

To better reflect how decisions happen today, you need a new way to visualize the buyer journey, one that reflects how buyers behave now. That's why we use the B2B buying radar.

Instead of a narrow path from top to bottom, this model shows the buyer journey as a circular, multi-dimensional system. It captures the full complexity of modern decision-making, where buyers come in from different angles, engage on their own terms, and form opinions well before we ever know who they are.

In the radar, awareness lives at the center and expands outward. At the core, buyers are most aware, ready to engage or make a decision. As you move toward the outer rings, you reach buyers who are still figuring out their needs or aren’t yet thinking about a solution. These stages are inspired by Eugene Schwartz’s “Five Stages of Awareness,” a classic framework that explains how people move from being unaware to most aware.

Unaware: not yet conscious of a problem.
Problem aware: know something’s wrong but not sure what to do.
Solution aware: aware of possible solutions but not of your product.
Product aware: know your product exists, but still weighing options.
Most aware: ready to engage or buy.

Surrounding those rings is the full ecosystem of influence. Some of it you own: your website, blog, landing pages, case studies, and product content. Some of it you influence through paid media, SEO, partnerships, and PR. And much of it lives entirely outside your control: analyst reports, competitor pages, Reddit threads, LinkedIn comments, internal referrals, and community recommendations.

This view is built around three core truths:

Awareness is fluid. Buyers don’t move in a straight line; they enter and exit at different stages, often more than once.
Touchpoints are distributed. Your campaigns are just one part of the buyer’s research process. Influence comes from everywhere.
You don’t own the journey. You’re one voice among many. Buyers decide when and where to engage, and whether they trust you enough to take the next step.

What a real B2B journey looks like today

When you put a real buyer journey on the radar, it doesn’t look like a funnel. It looks like a web.

There’s no straight line. No clear beginning or end.

Buyers engage across a mix of touchpoints, many outside your control: analyst sites, user reviews, LinkedIn threads, competitor pages. They show up, disappear, resurface weeks later, sometimes as a different person from the same account.

The process isn’t linear, and it rarely involves just one person. Multiple stakeholders move in and out at different times, each bringing their own research and opinions.

Still, every touchpoint matters. These interactions shape how buyers think, build or break trust, and influence whether someone eventually engages or chooses a competitor.

This shift has real implications.

To stay relevant, marketing strategies must become adaptive, built around behavior, not stages. That means listening for signals, responding in context, and creating content ecosystems that support buyers no matter where or how they enter.

Your website plays a role at every stage of the journey. Make sure it adapts.

When you look at the modern buyer journey from the outside, it’s easy to feel like you’re losing control. And in many ways, you are.

Today, buyers do most of their research before they ever talk to your sales team. According to multiple studies, 70–80% of the buying journey happens independently and by the time a potential buyer lands on your site, they’ve already formed opinions.

That moment, the one where they finally reach your site, is high intent. But it’s also high risk.

The orange slice in this radar highlights the “Product Aware” stage, where your website often carries the most weight in converting intent into action. But your website’s role extends far beyond that slice. The entire “Owned” section across all stages represents the website in different forms.

Earlier in the journey, visitors use your website for education and guidance: blog posts, articles, and resources that help them understand problems and possible solutions. Later, as they become product aware, they turn to your website for trust and validation: pricing pages, demos, case studies, and testimonials.

In other words, your website is no longer just the first point of contact, because its role has shifted: it guides early research, supports trust-building, and becomes a conversion engine at the end of the journey.

That means it cannot just be static or generic. If it looks the same for everyone, you’re missing the chance to connect with buyers at the moment they need you most. That's why your website needs to respond to behavior. It should recognize what a visitor is likely interested in, based on their actions, their source, and their past engagement, and then adjust what it shows, how it speaks, and what it offers.

In short, it needs to adapt.

An adaptive website doesn’t just publish content. It listens. It remembers. It thinks. It adjusts. It helps buyers navigate complexity by meeting them where they are in their own journey, not where you expect them to be in yours.

This is where website personalization comes in, tailoring experiences based on visitor signals to bridge intent and conversion. And with the right foundation, like a data-driven headless CMS, these adaptations can be tested and scaled without relying on heavy dev resources.

That shift, from static to adaptive, is what modern lead generation depends on. Because when so much of the journey happens before the click, your site only gets one shot to prove you're the right choice.

Three big shifts driving this change

To sum it up, these are the key changes that every marketing leader should know about.

1) The journey is non‑linear.

Buyers enter at different points, loop back, and bring others in along the way. Planning around fixed stages misses real behavior. Planning around signals, what people do and where they came from, keeps you relevant.

2) The buyer is in control.

In 2020, vendors drove education with decks, demos, and PDFs. In 2025, buyers teach themselves through communities, analyst content, and competitor pages. Trust is built before a form fill. Showing up early, in the channels they already use, matters as much as what you say on your own site.

3) Personalization is the expectation.

Buyers don’t want generic campaigns. They expect relevant experiences that reflect their role, needs, and intent. In the past, segmentation was based on firmographics or job titles at best. Now, with tools like CDPs, intent data, and AI, you can recognize signals across channels, understand what a buyer has seen or done, and use that to tailor the experience. That doesn't require complex automation. It starts with simple, meaningful adaptations: speak directly to the visitor’s role, surface relevant proof points, and offer the next step that fits their context.

These shifts aren’t trends. They’re structural changes in how buying happens. And they reshape what marketing is responsible for.

That’s why marketers are rethinking their stack, from CRO tools to conversion rate optimization frameworks and increasingly relying on a data-driven CMS to stay aligned with unpredictable buyer paths.

So what you should do?

First, we need to let go of the idea that we can guide every buyer step by step.

Instead, we should focus on supporting their journey, wherever and however it unfolds.

That means:

Listening more than talking
Showing up in third-party channels we don’t own
Adapting in real time based on behavior, not assumptions
Mapping our content and campaigns not just to stages, but to scenarios, signals, and roles

It also means recognizing that your website is just one node in a larger decision network. It must adapt dynamically to visitors who are arriving from different paths, with different levels of intent, and different needs.

The best marketing teams today don’t try to control the journey. They build ecosystems of trust, visibility, and relevance, so that when the buyer is ready to act, they already know who they trust.